Arizona

  Intellectual Property Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
August 24, 2010
Intellectual-Property
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Intellectual Property News

 

ITC Institutes Investigation On Certain Lighting Control Devices

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has voted to institute an investigation of certain lighting control devices including dimmer switches and/or switches. The products at issue in this investigation are devices for controlling light and its intensity.

The investigation is based on a complaint filed by Lutron Electronics Co. of Coopersburg, PA, on March 2, 2007. An amended complaint was filed on March 19, 2007. The amended complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the United States of certain lighting control devices including dimmer switches and/or switches that infringe patents owned by Lutron. The complainant requests that the ITC issue a permanent exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order.

The ITC has identified Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc., of Little Neck, NY, and Control4 of Salt Lake City, UT, as the respondents in this investigation.

By instituting this investigation (337-TA-599), the ITC has not yet made any decision on the merits of the case. The case will be referred to the Honorable Robert L. Barton, an ITC administrative law judge, who will schedule and hold an evidentiary hearing. Judge Barton will make an initial determination as to whether there is a violation of section 337; that initial determination is subject to review by the Commission.

The ITC will make a final determination in the investigation at the earliest practicable time. Within 45 days after institution of the investigation, the ITC will set a target date for completing the investigation. ITC remedial orders in section 337 cases are effective when issued and become final 60 days after issuance unless disapproved for policy reasons by the U.S. Trade Representative within that 60-day period.

Contact our Arizona Intellectual Property Lawyer Now!

 

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
The widespread use of trademarks in sports is protected.
Trademark protection is widespread in sports and is estimated at 2.5 percent of world trade.

 


  Newsroom  
 


News about Intellectual Property cases in Arizona and nationwide:

Importance Of Intellectual Property Protection To Businesses
Utica, NY -Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO...
Read more >


U.S. To Assist In Combating Intellectual Property Theft
Nashville Event Part of National Crackdown on Counterfeiting, Piracy

Washington, D.C. --U.S. Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intell...

Read more >


Operator Of For-Profit Software Piracy Website Pleads Guilty
Caused Up To $20 Million in Losses to Software Industry

WASHINGTON—The owner of a massive for-profit software piracy Web site pleaded guilt...

Read more >


More Intellectual Property News >

 
 

Intellectual Property Terms

 


Today's Terms

Sound Recording

Definition:
A category of copyrightable work consisting of the sounds that are recorded in a phonorecord.

Madrid Protocol

Definition:
Is an international treaty that allows a trademark owner to seek registration in any of the countries that have joined the Madrid Protocol by filing a single application, called an “international application.”

Musical Work

Definition:
A category of copyrightable work expressed in notation or sounds. A composer's song is covered by a musical work copyright, but a recording of the song is covered by a sound recording copyright.

More Intellectual Property Terms >

 

Intellect. Property Resources

 


Search Intellectual Property resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Intellectual Property Hot Topics

 


Topics Related to Intellectual Property:

  • Copyright Issues
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Unfair Competition Concerns
  • Right of Publicity Questions
  • Confidentiality Agreement
  • Patent Corporation Treaty

More Intellectual Property Topics >

Arizona Intellectual-Property Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Intellectual-Property attorney you should contact our Intellectual-Property Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Apache Junction
  • Avondale
  • Buckeye
  • Bullhead City
  • Casa Grande
  • Cave Creek
  • Chandler
  • Chino Valley
  • Cottonwood
  • Douglas
  • Flagstaff
  • Florence
  • Fountain Hills
  • Gilbert
  • Glendale
  • Green Valley
  • Kingman
  • Lake Havasu City
  • Mesa
  • Nogales
  • Paradise Valley
  • Payson
  • Peoria
  • Phoenix
  • Prescott Valley
  • Safford
  • Scottsdale
  • Sierra Vista
  • Somerton
  • Sun City
  • Sun City West
  • Surprise
  • Tempe
  • Tucson
  • Yuma
s
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Arizona Intellectual Property Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.